Update (14-May-2011): HazeNet has been taken over by ThrustVPS / Rus Foster. Read more about it here
Update (29-Aug-2010): Please check the latest benchmark results from their XEON node, pretty awesome for a 1024MB VPS.
Unix Benchmark results from HazeNet VPS using unixbench v 5.1.2 (please note that these are Quad-Core benchmark and not the new i7s and XEON that they are offering)
Specs: 1GB / 50GB OpenVZ
# # # # # # # ##### ###### # # #### # #
# # ## # # # # # # # ## # # # # #
# # # # # # ## ##### ##### # # # # ######
# # # # # # ## # # # # # # # # #
# # # ## # # # # # # # ## # # # #
#### # # # # # ##### ###### # # #### # #
Version 5.1.2 Based on the Byte Magazine Unix Benchmark
Multi-CPU version Version 5 revisions by Ian Smith,
Sunnyvale, CA, USA
December 22, 2007 johantheghost at yahoo period com
1 x Dhrystone 2 using register variables 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 x Double-Precision Whetstone 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 x Execl Throughput 1 2 3
1 x File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 1 2 3
1 x File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1 2 3
1 x File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1 2 3
1 x Pipe Throughput 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 x Pipe-based Context Switching 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 x Process Creation 1 2 3
1 x System Call Overhead 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 x Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 1 2 3
1 x Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1 2 3
4 x Dhrystone 2 using register variables 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
4 x Double-Precision Whetstone 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
4 x Execl Throughput 1 2 3
4 x File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 1 2 3
4 x File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1 2 3
4 x File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1 2 3
4 x Pipe Throughput 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
4 x Pipe-based Context Switching 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
4 x Process Creation 1 2 3
4 x System Call Overhead 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
4 x Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 1 2 3
4 x Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1 2 3
========================================================================
BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 5.1.2)
System: kc: GNU/Linux
OS: GNU/Linux -- 2.6.18-194.3.1.el5.028stab069.6 -- #1 SMP Wed May 26 18:31:05 MSD 2010
Machine: i686 (unknown)
Language: en_US.utf8 (charmap="UTF-8", collate="UTF-8")
CPU 0: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Quad CPU Q9400 @ 2.66GHz (5333.2 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
CPU 1: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Quad CPU Q9400 @ 2.66GHz (5333.2 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
CPU 2: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Quad CPU Q9400 @ 2.66GHz (5333.1 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
CPU 3: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Quad CPU Q9400 @ 2.66GHz (5333.2 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
21:26:27 up 3 days, 17:20, 1 user, load average: 0.11, 0.04, 0.01; runlevel 2
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Fri Jul 23 2010 21:26:27 - 21:54:42
4 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 12321177.3 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 2399.6 MWIPS (9.5 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 3425.0 lps (29.8 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 404117.8 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 120797.7 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 912271.1 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 752344.5 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 147959.1 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 10617.7 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 4192.8 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1061.4 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 655556.1 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 12321177.3 1055.8
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 2399.6 436.3
Execl Throughput 43.0 3425.0 796.5
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 404117.8 1020.5
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 120797.7 729.9
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 912271.1 1572.9
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 752344.5 604.8
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 147959.1 369.9
Process Creation 126.0 10617.7 842.7
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 4192.8 988.9
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 1061.4 1769.0
System Call Overhead 15000.0 655556.1 437.0
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 793.1
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Fri Jul 23 2010 21:54:42 - 22:23:49
4 CPUs in system; running 4 parallel copies of tests
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 37577505.1 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 9217.4 MWIPS (10.2 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 8328.6 lps (29.6 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 243880.6 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 66651.4 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 635842.8 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 2313723.6 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 797833.2 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 23557.1 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 9255.1 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1202.9 lpm (60.1 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 1724823.0 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 37577505.1 3220.0
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 9217.4 1675.9
Execl Throughput 43.0 8328.6 1936.9
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 243880.6 615.9
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 66651.4 402.7
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 635842.8 1096.3
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 2313723.6 1859.9
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 797833.2 1994.6
Process Creation 126.0 23557.1 1869.6
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 9255.1 2182.8
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 1202.9 2004.9
System Call Overhead 15000.0 1724823.0 1149.9
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 1466.8
root@kc:~/unixbench-5.1.2#
HazeNet good?
HazeNet is pretty good 🙂
Wait till you see the latest benchmark results from my ThrustVPS XEN HVM. They soured up to 2000+
I've just signed up for HazeNET. Colin the CEO is terrific – very helpful and reasonable, with almost instant responses even on the weekend.
I got 1339 UnixBench from Haze, with their 1024 plan on a Xeon E5405 host.
Wow, welcome to the HazeNet family. I now have two VPSes with Colin, CEO HazeNet
[…] HazeNet, OpenVZ, unixbench, VPS, XEON This benchmark is #2 in the series from HazNet, the previous one was done on their Core2Quad series and this one is on their latest XEON […]
HazeNET bandwidth is good. HazeNET's OpenVZ implementation is moderate to good. HazeNET's uptime is poor. HazeNET's customer communication and billing is horrid.